Circulating tumor necrosis factor receptors are associated with mortality and disease severity in COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND: Although hyperinflammatory response influences the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), little has been reported about the utility of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related biomarkers in reflecting the prognosis. We examined whether TNF receptors (TNFRs: TNFR1, TNFR2) and progranulin (PGRN) levels, in addition to interleukin 6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP), are associated with mortality or disease severity in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at Juntendo University Hospital. Eighty hospitalized patients with various severities of COVID-19 were enrolled. Furthermore, serum levels of TNF-related biomarkers were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients died during hospitalization, and 55 were discharged. The median (25th and 75th percentiles) age of the study patients was 70 (61-76) years, 44 (55.0%) patients were males, and 26 (32.5%) patients had chronic kidney disease (CKD). When comparing with patients who received and did not receive treatment at the intensive care unit (ICU), the former had a higher tendency of being male and have diabetes, hypertension, and CKD; had higher levels of white blood cells, D-dimer, and lactate dehydrogenase; and had lower body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and lymphocyte counts. Significant differences were observed in TNFR, PGRN, IL-6, and CRP levels between each severity (mild-severe) group. Furthermore, the serum levels of TNFR, IL-6, and CRP, but not PGRN, in ICU patients were significantly higher than in the patients who were not admitted to the ICU. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that high levels of TNFR2 were only associated with mortality in patients with COVID-19 even after adjustment for relevant clinical parameters. CONCLUSIONS: High TNFR2 level might be helpful for predicting mortality or disease severity in patients with COVID-19.

COVID-19-induced acute renal tubular injury associated with elevation of serum inflammatory cytokine.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 has rapidly spread worldwide, with acute kidney injury (AKI) as one of the manifestations with unknown causal mechanisms. We aimed to investigate tubular injury by assessing tubular markers and their association with the severity of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: We examined the associations between laboratory markers and urinary levels of N-acetyl-ß-D-glucosaminidase (uNAG), ß2-microglobulin (u ß2MG), α1-microglobulin (u α1MG), and liver-type fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP). We studied 18 COVID-19 patients without previous chronic kidney disease and analyzed the relationship between the urinary biomarkers and inflammatory markers in patients with severe (n = 7) or non-severe (n = 11) COVID-19, defined by requirements of supplemental oxygen. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (78%) showed abnormal urinalysis findings and two (11%) developed AKI. Patients with severe COVID-19 had significantly higher levels of proteinuria, uNAG, uß2MG, uα 1MG, and L-FABP than those with non-severe disease. Serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) were significantly higher on admission in all severe COVID-19 cases and correlated with the levels of L-FABP, uß2MG, uα1MG, uNAG, and proteinuria. Moreover, the changes in serum IL-6 (ΔIL-6) levels from baseline to 7 days after admission significantly correlated with ΔL-FABP and Δuß2MG. CONCLUSIONS: Levels of tubular injury markers, especially L-FABP and uß2MG, were significantly associated with IL-6 levels even in patients with no evident AKI. This suggests that L-FABP and uß2MG could be useful as early detective biomarkers for COVID-19 associated renal injury.

Continuous extracorporeal treatments in a dialysis patient with COVID-19.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is now a major global health threat. More than half a year have passed since the first discovery of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV2), no effective treatment has been established especially in intensive care unit. Inflammatory cytokine storm caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection has been reported to play a central role in COVID-19; therefore, treatments for suppressing cytokines, including extracorporeal treatments, are considered to be beneficial. However, until today the efficacy of removing cytokines by extracorporeal treatments in patients with COVID-19 is unclear. Herein, we report our experience with a 66-year-old male patient undergoing maintenance peritoneal dialysis who became critically ill with COVID-19 and underwent several extracorporeal treatment approaches including plasma exchange, direct hemoperfusion using a polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column and continuous hemodiafiltration. Though the patient developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) repeatedly and subacute cerebral infarction and finally died for respiratory failure on day 30 after admission, these attempts appeared to dampen the cytokine storm based on the observed decline in serum IL-6 levels and were effective against ARDS and secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. This case suggests the significance of timely initiation of extracorporeal treatment approaches in critically ill patients with COVID-19.